Could you please describe: * Which release you are basing this bug on? * Describe why you'd want the static library?
I'm somewhat quite against static libraries as much as possible if people can do without. On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, 10:41 am Graham Inggs, <1908...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > It seems this was intentional, from debian/changelog: > > > libxslt (1.1.34-1) experimental; urgency=medium > > ... > * Stop building and installing the static library. > ... > > -- Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:22:08 +0100 > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908500 > > Title: > libxslt.a missing from libxslt1-dev > > Status in libxslt package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > The libxslt.a file is missing from 1.1.34 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxslt/+bug/1908500/+subscriptions > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxslt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908500 Title: libxslt.a missing from libxslt1-dev Status in libxslt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The libxslt.a file is missing from 1.1.34 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxslt/+bug/1908500/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
