@juliank : can we not spread the load over 24h without systemd timers ?
With a random sleep for example ? Surely people were spreading tasks
over a specific period before systemd got invented.

Also you say "they shouldn't then see more load than the archive mirror"
but archive mirrors and ESM mirrors are vastly different, in terms of
traffic, in terms of hardware, but also because ESM mirrors are HTTPS-
only with an authentication backend whereas the archive mirrors are
HTTP-only without authentication.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034656

Title:
  ESM archive getting DoSed with legitimate traffic every day at 06:25
  (cron.daily time)

Status in cloud-images:
  New
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-advantage-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hi,

  We're seeing frequent alerts on the Ubuntu ESM archive servers due to
  surges in requests. On two systems, I'm seeing this:

  | Sep  6 05:47:16 machine-2 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  6 05:47:17 machine-2 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM caches.
  | Sep  6 10:49:35 machine-2 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  6 10:49:35 machine-2 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM caches.
  | Sep  6 17:17:16 machine-2 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  6 17:17:17 machine-2 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM caches.
  | Sep  6 23:47:16 machine-2 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  6 23:47:17 machine-2 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM caches.
  | Sep  7 01:55:02 machine-2 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  7 01:55:02 machine-2 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM caches.

  On another:

  | Sep  6 02:41:02 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  6 02:41:03 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM 
caches.
  | Sep  6 09:02:40 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  6 09:02:41 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM 
caches.
  | Sep  6 15:32:40 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  6 15:32:41 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM 
caches.
  | Sep  6 22:02:40 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  6 22:02:41 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM 
caches.
  | Sep  7 04:32:40 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Starting Update the local ESM 
caches...
  | Sep  7 04:32:42 is-bastion-ps5 systemd[1]: Finished Update the local ESM 
caches.

  This is all from `/usr/lib/systemd/system/esm-cache.service` which
  calls `/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/esm_cache.py`.

  Can we please have this run less frequent? Perhaps only once daily
  which aligns with APT and apt-daily-upgrade.service / unattended-
  upgrades?

  Perhaps check existence of a file and run if not, then age of that
  same file and only run if it's older than a day?

  I think, from what I can see, this may be triggered from
  /lib/systemd/system/ua-timer.timer and /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20apt-esm-
  hook.conf?

  See also LP:1554848 which was for APT.

  On Trusty and Xenial clients we only seem to update daily, but the
  problem is worse as it's a cron.daily job, so all clients fire
  simultaneously - could we get this changed to a cron.d job with a
  randomised firing time instead?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2034656/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to