> I'm wondering why you added all those libFLAC.so.8 symbols to the > libflac++6 symbol file
Sorry about that, this was my first time using debcommit and I wasn't able to view the differences before submitting. I am going to write a program that can search http://archive.ubuntu.com/ to find a package that depends on libflac++6 and try to compile it with the new symbols. If it doesn't compile this should be an update to the major version of the package upstream. ** Changed in: flac (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Phil Pratt-Szeliga (pcpratts) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409483 Title: FTBFS: (package) on 32 bit arch's Status in One Hundred Papercuts: Confirmed Status in flac package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in flac package in Debian: New Bug description: libflac6++ produces a slightly different set of symbols for 64 & 32 bit. This currently causes 32 arch builds to fail as current symbols file is for 64 bit. This will not be confined to libflac++6, maybe? all future c++ with symbols files? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: libflac++6 1.3.1-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.18.0-8.9-generic 3.18.1 Uname: Linux 3.18.0-8-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.15.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Sun Jan 11 11:54:49 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-11-16 (56 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Alpha amd64 (20141114) SourcePackage: flac UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1409483/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
