Public bug reported:
I tried to put isc-dhcp-server in to complain mode due to issues with
/run and /var/run PID flags.
It gave me an error
root@here:/etc/apparmor.d# aa-complain usr.sbin.dhcpd
Setting /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhcpd to complain mode.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/aa-complain", line 30, in <module>
tool.cmd_complain()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apparmor/tools.py", line 184, in
cmd_complain
raise apparmor.AppArmorException(cmd_info[1])
apparmor.common.AppArmorException: "AppArmor parser error for
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhcpd in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhcpd at line 69:
Could not open 'dhcpd.d'\n"
due to #include <dhcpd.d> in usr.sbin.dhcpd
Two things confuse me. The use of '#' and '# ' to mean include and for
commenting respectively. Is this not going to make bug fixing more
difficult ?
and two should dhcpd.d include a full path ?
Why is app armour complain complaining with a standard file ?
Cheers
Simon
** Affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453088
Title:
isc-dhcp-server apparmor include
Status in isc-dhcp package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
I tried to put isc-dhcp-server in to complain mode due to issues with
/run and /var/run PID flags.
It gave me an error
root@here:/etc/apparmor.d# aa-complain usr.sbin.dhcpd
Setting /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhcpd to complain mode.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/aa-complain", line 30, in <module>
tool.cmd_complain()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apparmor/tools.py", line 184, in
cmd_complain
raise apparmor.AppArmorException(cmd_info[1])
apparmor.common.AppArmorException: "AppArmor parser error for
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhcpd in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhcpd at line 69:
Could not open 'dhcpd.d'\n"
due to #include <dhcpd.d> in usr.sbin.dhcpd
Two things confuse me. The use of '#' and '# ' to mean include and
for commenting respectively. Is this not going to make bug fixing
more difficult ?
and two should dhcpd.d include a full path ?
Why is app armour complain complaining with a standard file ?
Cheers
Simon
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1453088/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
