Public bug reported:

lxc-stop sends SIGPWR to a container's pid 1 to notify it that it should
shut down. This merely starts sigpwr.target right now, but nothing is
hooked into it. That's deliberate for "real iron" systems as there it's
usually UPSes sending that, which should be handled by e. g. nut, not
directly systemd. However, for containers I believe that's a safe
default.

https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-
users/2015-May/009279.html

SRU TEST CASE:
--------------
- Create a vivid LXC container (system or unprivileged)
- Try to lxc-stop it. With current vivid it will do nothing/hang, with the 
proposed version it will shut down as expected.

REGRESSION POTENTIAL:
---------------------
- This new unit is only active in containers (LXC, docker, nspawn, etc.). There 
a possible regression is that someone is running/testing nut or a similar UPS 
responder in a container, but that seems like a theoretical scenario only.
- There is no change for VMs or "real" hardware.

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Medium
     Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti)
         Status: In Progress

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu Vivid)
     Importance: Medium
         Status: New

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
     Importance: Medium
     Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti)
         Status: In Progress


** Tags: systemd-boot

** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Vivid)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Tags added: systemd-boot

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Vivid)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Description changed:

  lxc-stop sends SIGPWR to a container's pid 1 to notify it that it should
  shut down. This merely starts sigpwr.target right now, but nothing is
  hooked into it. That's deliberate for "real iron" systems as there it's
  usually UPSes sending that, which should be handled by e. g. nut, not
  directly systemd. However, for containers I believe that's a safe
  default.
  
  https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-
  users/2015-May/009279.html
+ 
+ SRU TEST CASE:
+ --------------
+ - Create a vivid LXC container (system or unprivileged)
+ - Try to lxc-stop it. With current vivid it will do nothing/hang, with the 
proposed version it will shut down as expected.

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1457321

Title:
  lxc-stop does not shut down container

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Vivid:
  New
Status in systemd source package in Wily:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  lxc-stop sends SIGPWR to a container's pid 1 to notify it that it
  should shut down. This merely starts sigpwr.target right now, but
  nothing is hooked into it. That's deliberate for "real iron" systems
  as there it's usually UPSes sending that, which should be handled by
  e. g. nut, not directly systemd. However, for containers I believe
  that's a safe default.

  https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-
  users/2015-May/009279.html

  SRU TEST CASE:
  --------------
  - Create a vivid LXC container (system or unprivileged)
  - Try to lxc-stop it. With current vivid it will do nothing/hang, with the 
proposed version it will shut down as expected.

  REGRESSION POTENTIAL:
  ---------------------
  - This new unit is only active in containers (LXC, docker, nspawn, etc.). 
There a possible regression is that someone is running/testing nut or a similar 
UPS responder in a container, but that seems like a theoretical scenario only.
  - There is no change for VMs or "real" hardware.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1457321/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to