I agree authors SHOULDN'T use transparent backgrounds for icons. But they currently CAN. And what should we do in that case?
I'm proposing that we default to a white (or black) background for them, rather then actually rendering it as transparent. But I don't care what the solution is, as long as it's consistent. Currently, we are inconsistently rendering the icon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449295 Title: [Icons] Inconsistent tranparent app icon handling Status in Ubuntu UX: Triaged Status in unity8 package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I uploaded an app with an icon that had a transparent background. The Ubuntu Store scope renders it with a white background. The dash renders it transparent. The launcher renders it transparent. I think the Store is doing the right thing. But any solution is fine, as long as it is consistent. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1449295/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
