JJZolx;484334 Wrote: > Any chance of seeing the return of fully incremental scanning? You'd > have to do some kind of wrapup at the end of scanning each folder > (operating on the assumption that folders are roughly equivalent to > albums). After each folder, do an album wrapup, including finding > artwork and compilation determination. It would make the library much > more usable as each album is scanned. With a minimal amount of logic, > this could also be optimized. For instance, if you've just found and > cataloged a new album, there's no need to run the cleanups of stale > data. > > Overall, scanning would take a little longer because you're executing > some extra queries at the end of each folder (or even track, if you want > to get that incremental), so maybe it would need to be a scanning > option.
You just described basically how the new scanner operates. :) In fact, each *track* is handled individually, under the assumption that you can change just a single track and everything should just work, i.e. the album-level attributes can be updated, artwork changed, etc. -- andyg ------------------------------------------------------------------------ andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70142 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
