Phil Leigh;485955 Wrote: > I'm not John but I believe he is saying that in ascending order of > replay quality from lowest to highest (from the analogue outputs) the > results are: > > FLAC from SBS > FLAC from TinySC > WAV from SBS
That's also what I understood from his last post, but seems to contradict his earlier findings concerning SBS vs Tiny SC. Anyway, let's wait for his answer on that subject! I admit that I am a bit shocked by these tests, because I am currently in the process of ripping my entire collection (2000 CDs) in FLAC format. Should I stop right now and use PCM instead? As I am using a Mac platform, I suppose I would get AIFF files. Would that be different from WAV files, regarding audio quality? And what are the tagging possibilities with such file format? -- rotho ------------------------------------------------------------------------ rotho's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33493 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70979 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
