pfarrell;486032 Wrote: 
> technobear wrote:
> > The differences being heard here will be due to increased jitter or
> > noise - or possibly both - when the processor is working hard to
> decode
> > a FLAC file.
> 
> What?!? Pure speculation.
> 
> Flac was designed specifically to be easy to decode by low powered
> devices. A Touch is far more powerful than flac requires.
> 
> Go dissemble wild speculation elsewhere.
> 
> -- 
> Pat Farrell
> http://www.pfarrell.com/

Let's hear your alternative theory then.

I can hear a clear difference using a Transporter between FLAC decoded
on a PC and FLAC decoded on the Transporter.

Of course you need a high-end system and well-recorded material to hear
the difference. Most people simply will not hear any difference because
their systems or their ears are not up to the job.

I don't really care either way as I only use WAV.


-- 
technobear

Chris

Transporter >> Beresford Caiman >> Croft Syntegra >> Zu Druid MkIV ('My
Hifi' (http://www.technobear.btinternet.co.uk/hifi/index.htm))
------------------------------------------------------------------------
technobear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1444
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70979

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to