pendletone55 wrote: > Then tell me something. What good is the touch? If it cannot serve as > the SBServer
Er, its a fine, limited SBServer. Its not a full blown PC/mac running SBServer, its too small in RAM and the CPU is too slow. Its called TinySC for a reason. I've never seen any claim that it will replace the real SqueezeBoxServer in all cases. I expect that over time, the TinySC will grow and be more capable, but its never going to be as capable as a old discarded desktop PC with real memory and real CPU. Its good as a replacement for your ancient Classic, and for folks with limited requirements the bundled TinySC is fine. For years, folks have bought SqueezeBoxen and then complained that they had to run a server. So the TinySC solves the problem for a lot of folks. But not for all. If I were King, I might have released the Touch last year without TinySC, because its a nice player. But I'm not King. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
