325xi;548000 Wrote: > You're missing the point. Radio energy diminished to 50% within inches > from antenna. Being very close to transmitter is not the same as just > being in the same room. Having extra wifi transmitter very close to > other audio components and cables that can possibly be not well > isolated from EMI/RF isn't necessarily a good idea
The origin of this tread was the FUD about wifi being dangerous to children.. Not the audiophile concern about disturbing the other Equipment in the rack. How valid that is I have no idea at all, I have not heard any obvious. difference since disabling it on my Touch , but I use shielded cables and my equipment is grounded. But I suspect if wifi where a problem for an audio circuit the Touch itself would be the first victim as it's circuits is closest to the source and no shielding . But then again I use the spdif output. This would be possible to test with audio diff maker I suppose ? More jokes: >From the front-line of FUD statistics: "A fall from a tall building is 100% deadly to a pregnant woman" -- Mnyb -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J and assorted amps SiriuS, Classe'Primare and Dynadio speakers (including a pair of Contour 4 ) Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: SB3 + powered Fostex PM0.4 Miscellaneous use: Radio (with battery) I use a Controller various ir-remotes and a Eee-PC with squeezeplay to control this ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76291 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
