Dura;577046 Wrote: > I think the argument about the buffer is really good. > As always, the truth should be in listening, but that is sometimes > easier said then done, and the A.N. Suffers are very tight. > using wireless it seems to me there are two possibilties, taking into > account the buffer thing: > 1) wireless is Evil because it causes the wireless receptor to be > active giving pollution in the system or: > 2) wireless is Good, because now that horrible poisoned RFI from the > router or server cannot reach your Squeezebix, at least not by signal > wire. > > Me, I love 2), sounds very plausible and happens to be convenient to > me, since my router and PC are on the other side of the house.
I agree "the truth is in the listening". I defy anyone to prove - or even claim! - that they can hear a difference bwteeen a properly working ethernet or Wlan connection. Curiously, if anyhting there is more of a chance of the ethernet sounding worse due to some people stupidly using cat6 SHIELDED cable! -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Digital,Kimber Speaker & Chord Interconnect cables Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82026 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
