Mnyb wrote: 
> FLAC would have been better as it has better metadata support ?
> 
> How do you tag the WAV files ? ( what are you ripping with ) most
> rippers don't tag them at all afaik ,so you be left with file and folder
> names as only info source ( no metadata about artists and album and such
> things in the files themself ).
> Do you use cue sheets ?
> 
> If you use the "music folder" meny can you see them now ? ( note won't
> work with cue sheets ).

HI thanks also to responding

Yes I did look at FLAC files but to my ears I thought WAVS sounded
better.

I used windows media player to rip the cd's, it found most of the
artwork and all of the tracklists. A small amount of cds I inserted
Album artwork after within windows media player by going over the cd
icon and paste album artwork

No I dont use cue sheets, Dont entirely understand by what you mean by
"music folder" The cds are all at base level and not within a folder.
Each artist has its won folder with there cds inside it as per the way
windows media player has done it. Like i said, Tested earlier with about
30 cds from different artists and all worked ok.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
m13kyf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56106
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=95052

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to