Turnandcough wrote: 
> I read that the Touch' USB output was better than its S/PDIF output. 
> I'm very curious by nature and I needed to find out for myself.
> 
> It's not night and day but I can say that adding the V-Link in the mix
> HAS improved the sound somewhat. It's just a bit more rounded and easier
> on the ears. Expectation bias? I don't think so. 
> 
> I also keep reading that a computer hooked up to a decent USB DAC or USB
> converter/DAC bests the Touch hooked up to the same DAC by a decent
> margin so my next step will be to connect the V-Link to a PC.
> 
> I didn't want to spend a fortune on an expensive USB converter just to
> satisfy my curiosity. I forget who, but someone on Computer Audiophile
> did a review of the V-Link 192 and rated its sound quality to be about
> 90% of the best out there. So I when I saw it for 1/2 price on Music
> Direct I went for it.
> 
> Hope that explains my "irrational" behavior. I'm not being sarcastic
> either.

Async USB may be better when the DAC has the corresponding USB -input-,
but USB spdiff converter is not the same thing you have not removed
spdiff out of the picture at all , hence the whole idea seems a bit off
??

The rationale behind the existence USB/spdiff converters is to provide
spdiff where there is none , from some laptop to a dac that does not
have usb for example .


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94512

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to