DanSmedra wrote: 
> Of course not. Why would I make that assumption? And why would I even
> care?

Because you might want to know if the improvement you hear is because of
superior technology, or just better/different source material. 

> If TIDAL uses a higher-quality archived source to fill out its MQA
> streaming library and it produces better fidelity/sound quality to MY
> ears on my system, I don't give a rat's a$$ what's happening on the back
> end.

The reason you might care is because if the difference is due to better
(or at least different) source material, you could have gotten the same
result even without MQA. 

> But I can understand why not a few high-end audiophiles might be
> emotionally vexed. Over decades, they drop tens of thousands of dollars,
> or far more, into esoteric equipment, always tweaking, and an equal
> amount of dollars into various hi-res format libraries in hopes of
> having the biggest sound phallus with the goal to impress. 
> 
> But then along comes Bob Stuart with MQA, and with the tangible
> possibility that great studio-quality music could be enjoyed by anyone
> with a modest system...well yes, I'm sure that's scary.

You make it sound like MQA is some pixie dust (unicorn fart?) that will
bless even modest systems with magic properties. I see MQA as a solution
to something that might have been an issue 5 years ago, but isn't any
more.

'Archimago seems to agree with me.'
(http://archimago.blogspot.com/2017/02/comparison-hardware-decoded-mqa-using.html)

Anyway, I think this discussion belongs down in the "audiophile"
section.



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106754

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to