on 6/8/2000 10:54 PM, Andy Glick at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I also checked out the Village distribution and see that there is no
> connection pooling mechanism included with it. Did I miss something? I
> am not suggesting that Town be implemented without a pooling mechanism,
> it is much better off with one than without one. I'm really attempting
> to ask if DBConnectionBroker is the right one.
Village is just an implementation of dbKona, so no, it doesn't have a pool.
Turbine has the pool that I would use. It is singleton based and kicks butt.
<http://java.apache.org/turbine/>
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
