On 06/16/2012 10:47 AM, David Seikel wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:20:11 +1000 David Seikel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Then there would be a toy I'm calling toyboxes. > > Hmm, seems toybox does not like toy names that partially match the > names of other toys. Every time I try to use "toyboxes", it finds > "toybox" instead.
The multiplexer name is a special case, so you can have more than one of it via a postfix. So if you want to isolate suid support you can have two binaries, one without the suid bit and the other with, and have both in the $PATH as "toybox" and "toybox-suid", for example. I did that in busybox years ago. That's why my static busybox binaries were "busybox-i686" instead of "i686-busybox": you didn't have to rename it to use it, just set the executable bit. Rob -- GNU/Linux isn't: Linux=GPLv2, GNU=GPLv3+, they can't share code. Either it's "mere aggregation", or a license violation. Pick one. _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
