On 09/14/2013 09:59:42 PM, Ashwini Sharma wrote:
IPv6 is in fact important. Working on it, but was confused whether to
have
the IPv6 support
in the same traceroute.c or separate. As far as I see, there will be
lot
many if/else checks for IPv4/IPv6 cases.
Like for the incoming packet parsing.
Give me a unified one and I'll try to clean it up.
The way the kernel added IPv6 support is kind of horrible, it _should_
be as similar as possible an not have so many gratuitous differences.
That said, we cope with what we're given. I don't want to have
ping/ping6, I want to have one that does both. I don't want
traceroute/traceroute6, netcat/netcat6, and so on.
(Fell way behind on email after Ohio LinuxFest. trying to catch up...)
Thanks,
Rob
_______________________________________________
Toybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
