On 11/05/2013 10:19:32 PM, David Seikel wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:06:10 -0800 ibid...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:05:50AM +0200, Bertold Van den Bergh
wrote:
> >
> > Can commands be accepted that are not on the roadmap? I will
> > certainly need 'ntpdate' which for embedded systems is better than
> > a full blown ntpd.
>
> That would be a question for Rob.
>
> That said, I'd be in favor of it. Having *not* examined NTP in
> detail, I get the impression that it might be possible to have ntpd
> and ntpdate share much of their code.
Aboriginal Linux uses rdate, which is also not on the toybox roadmap.
I would have thought that rdate or ntpdate would have been.
Either would be good. I vaguely recall that rdate uses a simpler but
semi-deprecated network standard. Figuring out what to do there is
somewhere way down on my todo list. :)
(If either was in toolbox, it would be on the roadmap...)
Rob
_______________________________________________
Toybox mailing list
Toybox@lists.landley.net
http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
