On 04/02/14 20:25, Samuel Holland wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > Here is a basic implementation of fold[0]. It does not support multibyte > characters, though that would probably just require more switch cases. This > is my first contribution, so please comment your thoughts/what I can improve.
Seems pretty decent. Applied to pending. > I was planning to write an "unfold" utility that basically did the opposite. > Although I don't think it's in any standard, would it still be of any > interest? > > [0] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/fold.html The -u option to fold isn't currently being used... Could you describe a little more how unfold would work? Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
