I should send this to the mailing list: On 07/17/14 05:54, Rob Landley wrote: > On 07/17/14 00:50, technosaurus wrote: >> rather than open() with subsequent close(), why not use access(toybuf, F_OK) > > It's been several years since I wrote this, but the comment a couple > lines above says "open the device to force reread of the partition table". > > Rob >
On 07/17/14 08:12, Rob Landley wrote:> On 07/17/14 00:58, technosaurus wrote: >> I think this is the same as daemonize() in toybox/lib. Should daemonize >> just be defined to daemon(0,0) or is there a reason for it? > > daemon() isn't posix, so I have to figure out if it's best to > reimplement it for portability, or just stick with the libc function we > inherited from BSD and wait for the standard to catch up. In the > meantime, it's in lib/pending.c for the same reason toys/pending exists, > as toys/pending/README says this stuff needs further review. > > Rob > _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
