13 октября 2014 г. 8:51:13 KRAT, Rob Landley <[email protected]> пишет: >My question is: should I _also_ include the old raw socket support (as >a >fallback? With a config option?) or is it good enough to just have this >and not support ping on 2.6 kernels? (It's easy enough to make it >compile even when it does work, or to have a compile-time probe to >switch it off in defconfig...) >
Will ping work when invoked by root or not in that case? The old and always worked way is prefferable IMO. Is there a reason to change? I, for example, use ping (and other such tools) with a universal setuid wrapper which (re)execs it as "user,root:user,user". I do not want any breakage here in future. >Rob > >_______________________________________________ >Toybox mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
