On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:17:44 +1100 scsijon <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I was wondering if toybox 'could / would be able to' have an auto
> tool built into it. I'm not a coder, so can't do it, but....
> 
> Along the line of:
> --
> If toybox had the command 'siliswap' built into it, but it's inbuilt 
> siliswap was a subset of the full 'siliswap' command and it's
> complete set of switches, as for most people and programs it doesn't
> need the others.
> 
> If at a later stage, the user needs to install the full 'siliswap' 
> package because they need to use switches that are not built into 
> toybox's 'siliswap' then toybox's 'siliswap' knows to pass the
> request onto the full siliswap instead of dealing with it itself.
> --
> Not sure if it could be added without a shell file though and i'd
> prefer not to add to the default set. ?or could these be created
> automatically when toybox is first run, against all inbuilt packages,
> or manually with a toybox -cfg command).
> 
> And of course, toybox doesn't have or needs siliswap (it's a very old 
> IBM Mainframe silo interface command), i'm not sure it is even used
> anymore.
> 
> ...Just a thought...

Normally toybox just has symlinks of the command names that point to
the toybox binary file.  If you actually install packages with commands
that are in toybox then, depending on your package manager or whatever,
it's likely to overwrite the symlink with the proper binary file for
that command.

-- 
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Toybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net

Reply via email to