On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:18:19AM +1000, David Seikel wrote: > On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:10:07 -0500 dmccunney > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Rich Felker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:21:26PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > >> I plan to implement vi over the next year, but it's one of the four > > >> realy big commands required by posix (sed, awk, sh, vi) and I've > > >> been debugging sed against real-world data for _weeks_ now. (It's > > >> easy to knock out a simple 90% implementation. It's really hard to > > >> make something do everything right in all the cases people are > > >> going to throw at it.) > > > > > > It would be awesome to have mg too or a similar mg-like emacs clone > > > but with working unicode support. > > Mg is one I haven't heard of. Got a URL?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mg_%28editor%29 http://homepage.boetes.org/software/mg/ It's the only "emacs clone" I've ever seen that actually feels like real emacs (except the lack of slowness) for real editing tasks. The rest only look like emacs superficially, although jmacs (from joe) and qemacs (Fabrice Bellard) are somewhat close but still feel like semi-emacs-like bindings on a foreign editor. Rich _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
