On 11/13/2015 07:52 PM, enh wrote: > Yeah, we still have two different bug databases. This is the one you > can't see, but there's nothing in the bug that isn't in the commit message. > > Fun fact: you can append a commit message to random internal bugs by > adding a "Bug: " line with one of these numbers or URLs ☺ > > I usually don't add the bugs because they're meaningless to you, but I > don't really have a way to communicate "this was found by some other > internal team, not by me".
I assume you forward stuff from Google/Android the way Jose Bollo forwarded stuff from Tizen and Ashwini Sharma/Hyejin Kim from Company Carefully Remaining Nameless and so on. That said, gotta attribute the commit to somebody. :) > (also, since Gilad fixed the bug in the same way at the same > time, but minus the tests, i didn't want to steal all the credit.) I prefer to credit the bug finder given a choice. (Implementation is easy, figuring out what to do is the hard part. Reproducible test sequences that demonstrate a bug are _gold_...) I still have a local diff against find left over from http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2015-September/004464.html and I don't remember if this was one of the two issues I was trying to fix then, or if it's a third. (Sorry, modifying a dozen commands in parallel, balls tend to get dropped... Currently packing for my trip to Santa Diego and Santa Clara next week, might not get to this until I'm on the plane.) Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
