the only bugs that ever came to me (that i remember) were about the [deprecated and undocumented] traditional "head -4" syntax. despite that being deprecated and undocumented, it seems that almost no human uses the approved -n x instead.
we have tests now so neither should regress again. On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Tom Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure what this all the issues are exactly, but in my experience the > biggest thing toybox is missing wrt. busybox is awk (for recovery, as you > mention in a later message). This does not affect us internally, but it > does affect external users that flash opengapps. > > Elliott could probably elaborate more on head and tail. I don't normally > use them much on Android. > > > On 04/28/2016 05:28 PM, Rob Landley wrote: >> >> I'm still busy in Japan , but I bumped into >> >> http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software-hacking/tool-flashable-busybox-toybox-merger-t3313199 >> and I'm curious what they think is wrong with toybox head and tail? >> (They don't say. Possibly old stuff fixed since the snapshot M used?) >> >> I agree that gzip is still in pending for a reason. (Inflate is slow, >> and deflate isn't finished. It's on the todo list...) >> >> Rob >> _______________________________________________ >> Toybox mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net > > > _______________________________________________ > Toybox mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net -- Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/ Android native code/tools questions? Mail me/drop by/add me as a reviewer. _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
