On 06/09/2016 10:16 AM, enh wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 06/08/2016 09:59 PM, enh wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> yeah, as far as i can tell this is right. >>>> >>>> Ok, I'll apply it then. >>> >>> i can't actually tell any difference from this patch. remind me what >>> changed? >> >> Processes that weren't threads had a blank TNAME (because they >> didn't have a snapshot of their parent process's argv[0] in >> string slot 7). > > i don't see that without this patch. all three cases looked fine: > regular java threads (process+thread, different), single-threaded > processes like init or toybox (process), and kernel threads (thread, > no process).
Grrr, the large uninterrupted block of time I expected is totally not turning out like that (next week's gonna be nuts) I'll try to get a test case to prove the patch does what I think it does, and if not I can revert it. > (actually, TNAME is still more useful than NAME even for init and > toybox: it'll show "ps" rather than "toybox", for example.) argv[0], stat[2], and exe show different things. :) Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
