On 10/10/2018 11:43 AM, enh wrote: >> Then it works with glibc and musl, but _not_ with the android NDKr18: > > yeah, hard to know what to do with something non-standard like that, > but if we're in a world where some have one and others have the other, > we usually end up having both.
Indeed. It would be nice if there was a proper reference spec with test suite. I'm trying to establish a "minimal base system", but I can only swap out _some_ of the components (currently not including the kernel, and thus the kernel headers in the toolchains). > conveniently musl and glibc make _SC_UIO_MAXIOV the same as the > existing _SC_IOV_MAX so i'll do the same and it'll even be backwards > compatible for old OS releases. > > added by https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/bionic/+/783682 > and will be in r19. Cool. I was trying to cut the long-delayed release this past weekend (and now plan to do it this _coming_ weekend), and r18's all I've got, so I'll probably just #ifdef the symbol musl's missing with a TODO to remove it when r19 comes out. Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
