On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:07 AM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote: > > On 10/30/18 12:35 PM, Josh Gao wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:05 AM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net > > > > > (assuming current llvm doesn't barf on the extra flag) > > > > I have bad news for you: > > $ ./prebuilts/clang/host/linux-x86/clang-r339409b/bin/clang > > -Wmaybe-initialized > > -x c++ - > > warning: unknown warning option '-Wmaybe-initialized'; did you mean > > '-Wuninitialized'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] > > Which is why it was still on the todo list. Sigh. (Possibly llvm should > greenlight -Wno-* en masse if you're disabling something it doesn't _have_? > Dunno, not my area...)
i think the problem is: how would clang know whether it's an option for a different compiler versus a simple typo? > The downside of leaving cryptic notes-to-self late at night that you don't see > again for months. And I said "current" because the last llvm I checked (2016?) > didn't have it. I remembered "missing" but forgot what specifically was > missing > from where. I put it back on this release's todo list because somebody dinged > me > on IRC about the x = x assignments on twitter being nonstandard. I want to say > "Rich Felker" since he tends to be the nitpickiest standards rules lawyer I > hang > out with online, but it could be anybody at this point... > > Rob > > P.S. if you -x c++ toybox won't compile anyway. (C is not C++.) > _______________________________________________ > Toybox mailing list > Toybox@lists.landley.net > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net