On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:59 PM Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Still no llvm-cc symlink. :(
i'll pass that on to our LLVM folks. > The binaries on http://releases.llvm.org/download.html#7.0.0 don't have that > symlink either. Any idea how to poke the upstream llvm devs to _add_ it? you could file a bug, except their bug tracker isn't allowing new accounts because of spam. (this appears to have been the case for years now!) > Rob > > P.S. I know posix switched from "cc" to "c99" as the recommended compiler name > despite c11 being out for 7 years now. But as with tar->pax and yanking cpio > from their standard, and still specifying sccs and batch/qdel, nobody seems to > care. Posix is _way_ out of touch in places. > > If you want to wean things like the linux kernel build off of "gcc" as the > compiler name, "cc" is the name you go to, and it's one ubuntu's already got. > And you already have a constent "llvm-" prefix on every _other_ command in the > toolchain _except_ cc. > > P.P.S. No, I don't know why the llvm prepackaged binaries have llvm-cat. How > they can have llvm-diff, llvm-cat and llvm-diff are tools for concatenating/diffing bitcode files. they're not replacements for cat/diff. > llvm-size, llvm-split, and llvm-strings but _not_ > llvm-cc I couldn't tell you. It'd be really nice if they removed most of that > crap before builds grew dependencies on them... > _______________________________________________ > Toybox mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
