On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:07 PM Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1/20/19 4:20 PM, enh wrote: > > or that just isn't started yet (like hexdump), patch is probably in > > the worst state: that will need fuzz support (which POSIX describes in > > more detail than i would have expected: > > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/patch.html) > > This page does not contain the word "fuzz"? What were you referring to?
search for "1000 bytes"... > The following options were dropped from historical implementations of patch > as > insufficiently useful to standardize: > > -F The -F option specified the number of lines of a context diff to ignore > when searching for a place to install a patch. > > It doesn't implement .orig and .rej files either. And is one of the few users > of > get_line() instead of getline(), and should probably be converted... > > *shrug* All fixable, just... what do you need? > > Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
