like i said, it was their documentation that convinced me that they didn't support width/precision...
(though i accept your argument that even if that were true, that doesn't mean we shouldn't be more consistent. thanks for fixing that!) On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 6:46 PM Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > > The man page says: > > %t File's last modification time in the format returned by > the C `ctime' function. > > > $ ./find README -printf %t > Sat Dec 15 19:45:11 2018 > $ find README -printf %t > Sat Dec 15 19:45:11.9607922010 2018 > > You can't get nanoseconds from ctime() if its argument is a time_t pointer. > (Why > is it a pointer? Why not just the value? Who knows?) > > And amazingly, ctime_r does _not_ take a struct timespec *. > > So they reimplemented basic libc functions in their command, to add a fairly > obscure sub-option. > > <jazzhands /> > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > Toybox mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
