On 9/12/19 5:01 PM, enh wrote: > i think they're saying they want a system(3) that doesn't fork or > exec, it just runs toybox sh and other toys' code directly. > > i haven't understood whether they really _need_ this (some weird nommu > setup or whatever), or they're just very confused.
I'm working on toysh, at which point adding an xsystem() that calls sh_main() shouldn't be a huge deal. I just need to finish the shell first, and it's hard to think through this cold. Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
