On 5/16/20 5:39 AM, Eric Molitor wrote: > --- > toys/pending/route.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/toys/pending/route.c b/toys/pending/route.c > index 1fd3b55f..b4e7ea0d 100644 > --- a/toys/pending/route.c > +++ b/toys/pending/route.c > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ config ROUTE > bool "route" > default n > help > - usage: route [-ne] [-A [46]] [add|del TARGET [OPTIONS]] > + usage: route [-ne] [-A [inet|inet6]] [add|del TARGET [OPTIONS]] > > Display, add or delete network routes in the "Forwarding Information > Base".
Sigh. The ping stuff isn't two completely unrelated codepaths to support ipv6, it autodetects based on the address you specify, and only lets you specify to force name lookups to use a category when there are multiple responses (and abort when it hasn't got that type). And yes, I tested "ping -I 127.0.0.1 ::1" and such first thing: https://landley.net/notes-2017.html#16-07-2017 (And doing proper tests/ping.test is one of the things I hope "make root tests" lets me do...) Applied, but there are a number of reasons route is still in pending and this doesn't move it _towards_ getting out. :) Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
