On 6/11/20 4:41 PM, enh via Toybox wrote: > (Apologies for the length of this commit message, but it's not entirely > clear how we arrived at our present state, and right now all three of > toybox, busybox, and util-linux differ from each other. And it took a > week of arguments behind the scenes to agree on what we thought was the > right behavior, which seemed worth capturing for posterity.)
*blink* *blink* *fwoosh* right over my head. (I read it all, I just have no idea under what circumstances a system would have more than one battery backed up realtime clock, nor the kernel device enumeration policies in such a case.) *shrug* Applied... Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
