On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:22 PM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote: > > > > On 10/15/20 7:45 PM, enh wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:21 PM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote: > >> > >> On 10/14/20 3:21 PM, enh wrote: > >>> i've sent a new fix that just touches dirtree_path() so that it always > >>> honors the size request again. > >> > >> Applied, and then cosmetically fiddled with because I do that. > >> > >>>> but I leave for the airport to fly back to Japan in 2 hours. (Part of the > >>>> reason I've been so distracted lately, it's not JUST focusing on sh.c. :) > >>>> > >>>>> Caught by ASan. > >>>> > >>>> Operating on what path? > >>> > >>> the new patch's commit message makes it clearer that you can reproduce > >>> this with the existing tar tests, as long as you `export ASAN=1`. > >>> (would we need extra docker dependencies, or should we just turn that > >>> on for the github CI?) > >> > >> No idea. > > > > yeah, i was hoping our github CI expert would chime in :-) > > > >> I mentioned the ndk not working for this becuase of the need to build > >> --static > >> to run anything on a system that doesn't have bionic installed in /lib, > >> and asan > >> not working --static. > >> > >> I can install llvm 7 through the devuan apt-get (may 2019), but 11 just > >> shipped > >> and they don't have debian binaries, just ubuntu. MIGHT work? Not looking > >> forward to trying to build that from source, it's really brittle last I > >> checked... Ah, maybe I can follow: > >> > >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/llvm.html > >> > >> Um... is ninja part of cmake now? It lists cmake as a dependency but does > >> not > >> list ninja? Did they add ninja to the 10.x base? > >> > >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter08/ninja.html > >> > >> yes they did. Lovely... > >> > >> Anyway, question: is llvm 7 likely to be enough, or should I try compiling > >> llvm > >> from source to poke at this asan stuff? > > > > debian testing seems to have llvm 9 atm, and that's what i used, but, > > yes, asan's been stable for a while now so i'd expect 7 should be > > fine. > > "After this operation, 562 MB of additional disk space will be used." Sigh. On > aboriginal linux I had a gcc install in 14 megs and 11 of that was > /usr/include. > Why did they choose to write this in c++ again?
remember clang is always a cross-compiler, so one clang == lots of gccs. > So I installed llvm-7 and afterwards did not have either a "clang" or an > "llvm" > in the $PATH. So I installed clang-7 and still don't. I think I'm washing my > hands of debian's packaging of llvm because it DOESN'T WORK. (I now very > vaguely > recall trying this before and uninstalling it again for this reason.) works for me on debian: ~$ dpkg -S `which clang` clang: /usr/bin/clang ~$ update-alternatives --list cc /usr/bin/clang /usr/bin/gcc > I need to poke at LFS 10 anyway. I've mostly got mkroot back together and > booting again with toysh. Still need function() support and to finish > implementing the "source" command, and get the tests passing and turn > shtest.txt > into more tests, but it's almost ready to start throwing real stuff at? What > do > I need... > > Nope, do_math() is still a stub so no $(( )) yet. And I should probably do [[ > ]] > because some build script is likely to use that. And that TODO about \escapes > in > backquotes is probably gonna bite. (Yeah I still need to do array variable > support but I can wait for something to break needing it, same for shopt > nocasematch and so on.) Signal handling at least needs to be stubbed in so > "trap" isn't an unknown command, but them I've got a chunk of job control > pluming implemented already. I don't strictly need to do command line editing > and history before trying to build LFS with it but you REALLY notice it's > missing using it interactively... > > But... huh. It just went over 3500 lines and I'm sad about that, and yet it's > actually most of the way there? Ish? Sort of? Not THIS release, and plenty of > polishing stuff still to do, plus the PILE of bugs any real load is bound to > squeeze out... > > Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net