On 8/9/21 11:33 AM, enh wrote: > /me wonders whether the MIT relicensing of Plan 9 means there's now an MIT > licensed descendant/sibling of one true awk?
Alas, that would still be a license with the "drag this blob of text around" clause. But for your use, being able to say MIT instead of Lucent would probably be clarifying. Especially since Lucent hasn't technically existed since 2006... Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
