i'm not usually a pro-bloat kind of guy, but whenever i'm dealing with modules i wish the kernel just came with example1.ko and example2.ko for me to mess around with without actually causing any problems!
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 10:02 AM Rob Landley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/10/21 6:10 PM, enh via Toybox wrote: > > My original intent was to just get rid of the meaningless O_EXCL, which > > isn't used by the kernel, after noticing that it's passed here but not > > in modprobe's module removal code. > > > > But then I noticed that other rmmod implementations allow you to pass a > > list of modules, not just one (whereas we were ignoring all but the > > first). And that the help syntax was wrong. And that strend() lets us > > write the code to remove the ".ko" suffix a bit nicer. > > Applied. > > Modules are one of the things I need the mkroot+qemu test system to > regression > test. (I'm actually reasonably close to getting that test setup working. > The > blocker's been the shell, and toysh can run some reasonable scripts now...) > > Rob >
_______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
