the two musl itoa functions are both static, so there's no possibility of a clash (otherwise musl itself would have a problem internally!).
what was the actual issue you were seeing? On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 5:23 AM John via Toybox <toybox@lists.landley.net> wrote: > This is a simple patch for seq.c to rename itoa to toybox_itoa, to avoid > clashes with functions in the toolchain. > > As Piraty mentioned on IIRC there are 2 different implementations of itoa > in musl alone, so this should avoid any clashes people have with > implementations in their toolchain. > > -John > > Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com/> Secure Email. > > _______________________________________________ > Toybox mailing list > Toybox@lists.landley.net > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net >
_______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
