Okay, thanks for the feedback. I personally prefer nslookup over host, rarely use interactive and just use dig, if it is getting nitty-gritty. Anyways, I am not a good reference. Interactive mode is doable. Dig might be added later.
Best regards, Moritz Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> schrieb am Mo., 6. Juni 2022, 19:49: > On 6/6/22 11:55, Moritz C. Weber wrote: > > --- > > toys/net/host.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/toys/net/host.c b/toys/net/host.c > > index 20331678..933f4fb7 100644 > > --- a/toys/net/host.c > > +++ b/toys/net/host.c > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > > * See https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3596.txt > > > > USE_HOST(NEWTOY(host, "<1>2avt:", TOYFLAG_USR|TOYFLAG_BIN)) > > +USE_NSLOOKUP(NEWTOY(nslookup, "<1>2", TOYFLAG_USR|TOYFLAG_BIN)) > > The one I usually use is "dig". > > Isn't 80% of nslookup the interactive mode? (You can't even specify a > different > port without the interactive commands. Which you can specify on the > command line > too but it's the same command set...) > > Rob >
_______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net