On 11/3/23 09:27, Rob Landley wrote: >> and make it clear what new options >> should look like). > > I'd rather not apply the patch as is because of the above commit comment > grumbles, but don't object to code change itself. Should I switch the -64 to > &31 > while I'm there?
Because the precedence of & and | is borked for historical reasons having to do with logical operators not being introduced until a couple years into C's development, meaning x==']'-64 does what you expect and x==']'&31 does not without parentheses. That's why I did it that way, I remember now. :) Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
