i'm not sure what you're talking about? this isn't a hash-related test? FAIL: tar honor umask echo -ne '' | umask 0022 && rm -rf dir && mkdir dir && tar xf $FILES/tar/dir.tar && stat -c%A dir dir/file --- expected 2024-07-29 21:26:48.484171554 +0000 +++ actual 2024-07-29 21:26:48.668171554 +0000 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -drwxr-xr-x --rwxr-xr-x +drwxrwxrwx +-rwxrwxrwx
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 3:51 PM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote: > > On 7/23/24 14:55, enh via Toybox wrote: > > Fixes https://github.com/landley/toybox/issues/512. > > Applied, but could you email me the tarball for the tar "ownership" test that > produces the 2d7b hash? I'm getting a d9e7 hash here, and just confirmed the > previous laptop doing TEST_HOST with devuan brochitis was also producing d9e7. > (Which I didn't notice because passing all root tests is under the mkroot todo > item...) > > The downside of testing hashes instead of hd output is when it differs and you > can't reproduce the old one, it doesn't say why. You added this hash in commit > 43d398ad5d7b and it's possible it never worked for me, but if --owner --group > --mtime aren't squashing all the variables I'd like to know what still varies. > > Both toybox tar and host tar are producing the same output, so it's > presumably a > filesystem thing, possibly different passwd uids for "nobody"...? > > Thanks, > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > Toybox mailing list > Toybox@lists.landley.net > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
