> (Coding is easy. Figuring out what it's supposed to DO has always been > the hard part.)
I agree! And to repeat, that's what I'm saying OSH has already done. It's the most bash-compatible shell, by far - https://pages.oils.pub/spec-compat/2025-06-26/renamed-tmp/spec/compat/PASSING.html So I think sharing some labor rather than producing 4 different shells is a good idea ... e.g. in particular OSH has some holes on the interactive side, and we need to test it building real distros. And we have a budget of 50 K euros for the next 6-12 months. I realized that reducing test cases from real distro shell scripts (Alpine, Nix) is now a bottleneck. That is, we have plenty of isolated tests, but it's better to PRIORITIZE those by what actually happens in the wild. Andy _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
