Hey Krzysztof,

Could you please check which of the changes you have made have not be
committed/merged and resend to the list. I am afraid that I have lost
track of them :(

We can then reconsider why they have not been merged.

Tim 'Mithro' Ansell

On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 22:08 +0200, Krzysztof Sobolewski wrote:
> Lee Begg pisze:
> 
> > (...) And I thought there was no <descparameter> tag in Order Description,
> > but there is. It is unused.
> 
> OK, I changed my mind, if something is unused, it should be removed, because
> otherwise it adds unnecessary complexity to the generator or creates some
> empty, unused classes as a result.
> I'm attaching a patchset of proposed changes to documents:
> 
> - 0001 and 0002 are some old things that git tells me are not in upstream
> 
> - 0003 removes ObjectParameters from protocol3.xml entirely (if ObjectParams
> can be used to define TP03 objects, I will re-add it with all structures - I
> already have them)
> 
> - 0004 and 0005 remove <descstruct> from parametersets where there is no
> extra data for parameters (that is everywhere from protocol3.xml)
> 
> - 0006 changes useparameters and descparameter tags into property
> definitions that look like all other (integer, string, etc.) with a name,
> long name and optional description.
> 
> - 0007 adds a thing that will be very useful for my generator: a reference
> to a field that points to a parameter type, or parameter set type (parameter
> set is defined by OrderDesc/ObjectDesc). This thing is yet to be properly
> defined (at least for useparameters), because for orders (and objects in
> TP04) it's indirect. It could also be used (and I already did something like
> this) for objects in TP03 - just point at otype field and you're done (it
> incorporates a single parameter). This indirect stuff is what remains to be
> done in my generator and I want to make this "type field" pointer to declare
> what frame should I look at for a list of parameter ids. See, I want it to
> be a *complete* description of the protocol :)
> 
> 
> I suppose that my commit access is also to documents respository, but wanted
> to post them for discussion :)
> -KS
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Fajne i smieszne. Zobacz najlepsze filmiki!
> 
> >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1bbb
> _______________________________________________
> tp-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel

_______________________________________________
tp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel

Reply via email to