On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 17:20 +1100, Brett Nash wrote: > Hello All, > > > > One thing I'd really like to see added is better documentation on > > > failure messages - in particular for each command what type of failures > > > we can expect. Some errors would be universal, but some need to listed > > > that they can occur. > > > > I've added a few descriptions of what I think the error messages should > > be used for. They are probably a bit wishy-washy so feel free to pick on > > them. > > Just they are backwards - the errors that each request can return should > be listed. You can ignore the ones that can be on any case.
Okay, I think we should add this information. > > > I think it may be nice to add an extra info field for each failure too. > > > General reference may do it. But may be overkill, and may not cover all > > > cases. > > > > It may be overkill, can you think of any cases it may not handle? > > A ref to invalid object is kinda weird. Also references to "why this > packet is wrong" are quite weird. Also you may want to reference what > the type of the message was that was incorrect (rather then the client > trying to dig through to find out which message was which reference). Did we ever come up with a good solution for this problem? <snip> Tim 'Mithro' Ansell _______________________________________________ tp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
