On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:33 +1030, Tim Ansell wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 23:28 +1100, nash wrote:
> > > > Most annoying part of the protocol to be frank ;-)  Hence if there were
> > > > mandatory filters, I'd do something like:
> > > >         connect mesg
> > > >         -> reply
> > > >         getFeatures (protocol requires I believe)
> > > 
> > > Nope, only the connect message is required.
> > 
> > Saved a message then ;-)
> 
> Actually I think you should be able to send these frames as the first
> ones,
>  - get features
>  - get games
> 
> We could easily add the server identification string to both of those
> frames (and it actually makes sense too).
> 
> Lee, why did we ever want a connect frame anyway? It's pretty easy to
> tell if you have a valid TP frame quickly.

Isn't it for the redirect frame?  Or the Sod off, use SSL on port ++?

        Regards,
        nash

_______________________________________________
tp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel

Reply via email to