On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 19:33 +1030, Tim Ansell wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 23:28 +1100, nash wrote:
> > > > Most annoying part of the protocol to be frank ;-) Hence if there were
> > > > mandatory filters, I'd do something like:
> > > > connect mesg
> > > > -> reply
> > > > getFeatures (protocol requires I believe)
> > >
> > > Nope, only the connect message is required.
> >
> > Saved a message then ;-)
>
> Actually I think you should be able to send these frames as the first
> ones,
> - get features
> - get games
>
> We could easily add the server identification string to both of those
> frames (and it actually makes sense too).
>
> Lee, why did we ever want a connect frame anyway? It's pretty easy to
> tell if you have a valid TP frame quickly.
Isn't it for the redirect frame? Or the Sod off, use SSL on port ++?
Regards,
nash
_______________________________________________
tp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel