On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, nash wrote: > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 15:10 +0100, Krzysztof Sobolewski wrote: > > Tim Ansell pisze: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I think the OrderInsert message should either return the newly created > > > order or a fail frame (rather then the Ok/Fail it currently returns). > > > > > > This would save one round trip as after inserting the order you almost > > > always want to get the inserted order. > > > > > > I have been pondering this for a while and I am now sure this is the > > > right way to go. (Nash will probably like this :) > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > I definitely agree and even think this policy should be extended to other > > frames (wherever apropriate) (if not done already). Consistency is good > > ;) > > Agree with both comments here. >
Grumble, grumble, ok, ok, fine. Re: the extra round trip; having you heard of pipelining? :-p > Regards, > nash I'm not keen to extend this to other types without a good discussion. Later Lee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ tp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
