Wednesday 14 of May 2008 21:34:55 Marcel Hauf napisał(a): > I looked at the JavaOutputGenerator and the OutputGenerator interface. > For me it does not looks implementing friendly.
Well, I warned you... ;) > I need to write/translate each method by hand. I thought it would be less > work and I only need to implement a C# language code style and not the > complete code. It's only a quick implementation that worked well enough for me. No PhD stuff :) I'm not a laguages expert and I'm not sure I understand what you mean here... > The .Net frameworks provides already a code generator for C# and VB. > So I can use the codedom and an xml reader to go through the xml tree and > add a namespace, classes, methods, variables. > And if I want a different language I only need to implement a language > style. > > Currently I´m rethink what is easier, to implement a code generator based on > your JavaOutputGenerator or to continue on my own one. I'm not forcing anyone, do whatever is easier for you. -- Ecce Jezuch "Time never was as they are for me I'm happiest in a world full of error Time breaks my heart chnaged my soul again This time my friend" - H. Font
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ tp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
