"Fuchs, Andreas" <[email protected]> wrote on 12/21/2015 08:22:04 AM:
> > Let me emphasise this even more. It would be greate to have a kernel-space TPM > Resource Manager (everybody thinks to agree), but it would also bit > a big module > and a big programming investment. > > I ask the tpmdd-maintainers to check (reconcile with parent subsystem > maintainers) if a 3-5 kLoC module would be generally acceptable for a > TPM-ResourceManager? Does that include TPM 2 only or also TPM 1.2 ? The need for a light-RM inside the kernel is also there for TPM 1.2. Regards, Stefan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
