On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:18:08PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> wrote on 01/19/2016 > 01:08:02 PM: > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:53:40PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > This series has absolutely nothing to do with resource > > > management. > > > > Sure the patch doesn't, but the proposed application does. > > > > Linux namespaces is all about resource management. > The resource manager that's been discussed on the list is something > different, though, right?
No, I meant that discussion. A completed TPM resource manager would be very close to supporting a 'tpm namespace'. Ie per-ns virtualizing of the SRK with would be trivial. Access control would already be done out of the box as a consequence of the process-to-process isolation the resource manager would need to perform. Not sure about PCRS, I guess that depends on how that could work. Not sure it makes alot of sense in TPM 1.2 at least... Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
